BardonPraxis Message Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]
Chinese Elements
Message 00756 of 3835
Does anyone have any possible insights on the relationship, if
any, between the five Chinese (or Taoist) elements (metal, water,
fire, earth, and wood) and the classic four elements (keeping in
mind, of course, ether as well)? It seems that the Chinese elements
represent an entirely different scheme of division, one which cannot
simply be mapped onto or grafted with the more familiar four
elements. But given its ancient heritage and widespread popularity,
it would not seem right to simply write the five element theory off
as a different approach for different people, there seems to be
something as universal as the Chinese division as with the "western"
division. Drawing simple analogies between the two doesn't seem to do
the trick, it does appear that they are different in a more
fundamental way.
Further, does anyone have a grasp of the underlying principles
that would inform a five-fold elemental division rather than a four-
fold division? It seems that the four-fold division is saturated with
the idea of polarity, and the rythmic flow of things between two
poles. However, this polarity doesn't seem as sharp and crisp when
applied to the Chinese elements; indeed, the relationship between the
five elements seems more fluid, more slippery, more circular and less
centered then when dealing with four elements.
Main Index |
Thread Index