Re: New photos / 3rd Key

["peter_reist" <peter_reist@...>]

Dear Rawn,

>>>The key to this understanding is the direct perception of 
essential meaning. I suggest that you apply this faculty of 
perception to the colors themselves . . .<<<

At this moment in time I'm still working upon perfecting my ability 
to percieve essential meaning. I'm going to be keeping on working on, 
and eventually I'm sure I'll get it though.

>>>Yes, Bardon gave 27. However, Hebrew has 22 Letters (which are all 
consonants) and 5 basic vowel points. Bardon didn't discriminate 
between "Letters" and "vowel points" and thus presented 27 "letters". 
If you examine my Commentary Upon KTQ rather closely, especially my 
charts 1 & 2, I think you will understand how Bardon's letters and the
Hebrew match up.<<<

Perhaps a better question would be: why does the Sepher Yetzirah not 
deal with the five basic vowel points? D these vowel points deal more 
with the transition from Yetzirah to Assiah?

Also, within the inner circle of the Third Key I'm seeing three sets 
of four different colours. So in the inner circle we've got the three 
mother letters, the five vowel points...so what do the other four 
come in?

I have been playing around with the Third Key and am starting to see 
how some of the associations are fitting together. However, I'm sure 
that it'll take quite a lot of time to be able to see all of them. 
And I'm also pretty sure that I'll be setting aside this key for some 
time to more activly persue the work within IIH.

Love and Live well,
Peter Reist

--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> 
wrote:
> Dear Peter,
> 
> >> When I made the comment about step 8, I was refering to how all 
the
> colour symbolism relates to the actual universal principles that 
they
> are suppose to represent and what not all. <<
> 
> The key to this understanding is the direct perception of essential
> meaning. I suggest that you apply this faculty of perception to the
> colors themselves . . .
> 
> >> I do believe that the point of confusion that I am finding is 
that
> within Jewish Kaballah, there are only 22 letters. Whereas Bardon's
> system posits how many letters, 27, I believe? <<
> 
> Yes, Bardon gave 27. However, Hebrew has 22 Letters (which are all
> consonants) and 5 basic vowel points. Bardon didn't discriminate
> between "Letters" and "vowel points" and thus presented 
27 "letters".
> If you examine my Commentary Upon KTQ rather closely, especially my
> charts 1 & 2, I think you will understand how Bardon's letters and 
the
> Hebrew match up.
> 
> >> Moreover, all the letters are suppose to be mastered within each 
of
> the four realms: akasha, mental, astral and physical, correct? Yet 
here
> you're seeming to say that certian letters have an affinity with 
certian
> realms... <<
> 
> Yes. However, the fact that a specific Letter has an affinity with 
a
> specific realm does not preclude its usage in other realms. The 
nature
> of these affinities are the basis upon which formulae are 
constructed.
> 
> >> Now with regards to what you've said about the use of the key as 
a
> wheel: I think I get the general idea of it. However, I'm going to 
have
> to print out a couple copies of the key and play around with it a 
bit to
> see if I can actually apply it all. <<
> 
> :) Good luck!
> 
> My best to you,
> :) Rawn Clark
> 21 Jun 2003
> rawnclark@n...
> rawn@a...
> http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
> http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe