Re: questions . . .

["shadowdancers97420" <shadowdancers@...>]

I must manifest a raised right eyebrow about this post in light of 
the traditional attributions for the Hebrew letters Tav and J (Yod).
Ron 




--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> 
wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>snip< 
>> Bardon's 'T' and 'J' are closely related in that they are both 
linguals.
> 
> His 'J' is equivalent to the Hebrew 'Tav' or sharp 'Th' consonant. 
If
> you try pronouncing these, one after the other, you'll see how they 
are
> hidden in the same place in the mouth and in the same way. 
The 'Tav'
> (pronounced properly) ignites the same dark opalescence that Bardon
> described for the 'J'.
> 
> It is the 'Tav' materia, within which the analogies exist, that one
> makes use of in mummial magic. But it's the cognizance of these
> analogies that empowers mummial magic and this is why I would 
attribute
> it to 'Teth' instead of 'Tav'.
> 
> My best to you,
> :) Rawn Clark
> 21 Jul 2003
> rawnclark@n...
> rawn@a...
> http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
> http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe