RE: [BardonPraxis] visualization

["Stephen Miller" <qwertyguy3@...>]

Rand,

As Rawn mentioned, there are a lot of tips at the Bardon Companion website. 
The following is another description with some of the techniques that I've 
found helpful

First, as you?ve probably notices already, the mind has a tendency to create 
a constant stream of images. If you know what I am referring to, continue 
to observe them when you visualize. If you don?t, pick an object and 
picture it in your mind. Imagine it as strongly as you can. Most likely, 
this will be difficult. Much like thoughts and emotions, the image stream 
tends to jump from image to image. Continue to observe the image stream, 
and start to slow it down. Focus on the edges and the details of the 
images. Write them down if you wish, as this can help to slow down the 
stream and bring a single image into focus.

Now work on limiting the images. Try to guide the images to become things 
which fascinate you. Pick a single one, and focus on it. The image should 
overlay/displace the darkness that the physical eyes experience, but don't 
think of this as looking at it with the physical eyes (the commentaries on 
the site do a better job of describing this if it doesn't make sense). I 
find it helpful to imagine that my entire body, and especially my gut or 
solar plexus area is experiencing the object. This helps to make it more 
real to me. Again, describe the details and repeat what to your self what 
it is that you are looking it (?I am looking at a X?). The key is to 
approach the exercise with a relaxed, playful attitude while focusing on the 
details of the image rather than trying to force an image to appear.

Hope that helps,
Stephen M.

> From: "Rand" <hp_rand436103@...>
> Reply-To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
> To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BardonPraxis] visualization
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:34:40 -0000
>
> As to the visualization of objects beginning in step two of IIH-
> are we truly to "visualize"- as in see the object as if we were
> looking at it with our eyes - or are we to "immagine" it in every
> detail?
> Robert Bruce actually discusses this at length in his NEW, and also
> somewhat in "Astral Dynamics". I'm just wondering if we need to
> actually be able to "see" the objects as if visually, for the IIH
> work. If this is the case, have you any suggestions in making this
> happen?

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/