Re: mind chatter : what plane ?

["forestofsymbols" <forestofsymbols@...>]

Peter,

Mind chatter is more than just words. Have you had different 
experiences in this area?

mj


--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Reist" <preist@g...> 
wrote:

> From my understanding, mental chatter is, in part, a by product of 
a 
> civilization in which a physical form of speach is our predominat 
> language. In order to communicate with another person, typically, 
we 
> have to put our abstract thoughts and ideas down into physical 
words 
> so that another person can understand them. Having been programmed 
to 
> communicate in this manner with every person that you meet develops 
a 
> tendency to communicate with the self in such a manner. This does 
> not, however, preclude the possibility of communicating with the 
self 
> upon a purely abstract level of essential meaning. 
> 
> When I am conversing with myself, attempting to solve a problem, 
> write and essay, or some other such thing, I will very often find 
> myself looking at the gestaltic whole of the subject that I am 
> concentrating upon while fumbling for the words to put these 
> perceptions down into coherent, logical, finite sentences. If I 
> memrely communicate with myself in an attempt to solve such 
problems 
> upon the level of mental chatter, talking to myself, these 
> difficulties lessen slightly. The mode of mental conversation, be 
it 
> in the form of symbol, essential meaning, or words, seems to be 
> primarily dependent upon the end goal of where that idea is going 
to 
> be expressed: internally or externally.
> 
> This, of course, only holds for communication between you average 
> human beings. Communication between scholars that have developed 
the 
> astral senses, as well as communication between the scholar and a 
> spirit is another matter alltogether. One of which Rawn has 
discussed 
> in depth on his website.
> 
> Love and Live well,
> Peter Reist