Re: a question about the eucharist

["draco_io" <Draco_io@...>]

Dear 'beginner',

Bardon never really gave a good definition of what "akasha" is. 
There are several different meanings depending on which 
mystical/magical school you are talking about. If anyone can quote 
Bardon's comments/definition on "akasha," I would really love to hear 
it.

In any case, in step one, it's virtually unimportant what might be 
meant by the esoteric meaning of "akasha." Simply do the exercises 
to the best of you're ability and don't worry about it. Practice the 
material for 3 months and move on. Frankly, by the time you can 
literally reach a state of "emptiness of mind," you will be 
fully "enlightened" ( as in the sense of nirvikalpa Samadhi--and that 
will take years, if not decades). That's not required for step one, 
simply control the most topical thoughts. However, with practice, you 
will find that you are far more than the body-mind matrix you've 
always thought you were. That's enough for step one.

I would go farther and suggest that even if you don't feel you've 
mastered the material ( with the exception of the soul mirrors) move 
on after 3 months.

Transferring an idea into food is purely an imaginary process. The 
main significance is to get a person to: 
1. develop their imaginary abilities. 
2. Learn to absorb or ingest their own mental constructs rather than 
the nonsense that's thrown at them from the outside world. 
3. Hopefully, begin the process of unifying a person with their own 
soul.

If you can do that and maintain a relative attunement to your own 
soul, move on to step two. Anything else would be a waste of time. 

Shanti,

Fater QV 



--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> 
wrote:
> Dear 'beginner',
> 
> >> Could you please give an expample of the thought process of
> transfering the the idea into the food? <<
> 
> I suggest that you begin experimenting! :) Try out a variety of
> methods and find the one that works best for *you*. What works 
best for
> *me* is not any sort of "transferring" of the ideation, 
nor "projection"
> of it into the substance, etc. Instead, it is a matter of simply
> *knowing* without a doubt that the Akasha within the substance has
> absorbed my ideation. In fact, I will build the strength of my 
ideation
> directly *within* the substance itself. In other words, I focus my
> thoughts upon the substance and build my ideation within the 
substance,
> all the while *knowing* that the Akasha within the substance is 
greedily
> soaking up my ideation.
> 
> My best to you,
> :) Rawn Clark
> 06 Feb 2005
> rawnclark@n...
> rawn@a...
> http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
> http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe