Re: a question about the eucharist

["hermetics10" <hermetics10@...>]

Fater QV,

Thank you for your help.

beginner

--- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "draco_io" <Draco_io@h...> 
wrote:
> 
> Dear 'beginner',
> 
> Bardon never really gave a good definition of what "akasha" is. 
> There are several different meanings depending on which 
> mystical/magical school you are talking about. If anyone can 
quote 
> Bardon's comments/definition on "akasha," I would really love to 
hear 
> it.
> 
> In any case, in step one, it's virtually unimportant what might be 
> meant by the esoteric meaning of "akasha." Simply do the 
exercises 
> to the best of you're ability and don't worry about it. Practice 
the 
> material for 3 months and move on. Frankly, by the time you can 
> literally reach a state of "emptiness of mind," you will be 
> fully "enlightened" ( as in the sense of nirvikalpa Samadhi--and 
that 
> will take years, if not decades). That's not required for step 
one, 
> simply control the most topical thoughts. However, with practice, 
you 
> will find that you are far more than the body-mind matrix you've 
> always thought you were. That's enough for step one.
> 
> I would go farther and suggest that even if you don't feel you've 
> mastered the material ( with the exception of the soul mirrors) 
move 
> on after 3 months.
> 
> Transferring an idea into food is purely an imaginary process. The 
> main significance is to get a person to: 
> 1. develop their imaginary abilities. 
> 2. Learn to absorb or ingest their own mental constructs rather 
than 
> the nonsense that's thrown at them from the outside world. 
> 3. Hopefully, begin the process of unifying a person with their 
own 
> soul.
> 
> If you can do that and maintain a relative attunement to your own 
> soul, move on to step two. Anything else would be a waste of time. 
> 
> Shanti,
> 
> Fater QV 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...> 
> wrote:
> > Dear 'beginner',
> > 
> > >> Could you please give an expample of the thought process of
> > transfering the the idea into the food? <<
> > 
> > I suggest that you begin experimenting! :) Try out a variety of
> > methods and find the one that works best for *you*. What works 
> best for
> > *me* is not any sort of "transferring" of the ideation, 
> nor "projection"
> > of it into the substance, etc. Instead, it is a matter of simply
> > *knowing* without a doubt that the Akasha within the substance 
has
> > absorbed my ideation. In fact, I will build the strength of my 
> ideation
> > directly *within* the substance itself. In other words, I focus 
my
> > thoughts upon the substance and build my ideation within the 
> substance,
> > all the while *knowing* that the Akasha within the substance is 
> greedily
> > soaking up my ideation.
> > 
> > My best to you,
> > :) Rawn Clark
> > 06 Feb 2005
> > rawnclark@n...
> > rawn@a...
> > http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
> > http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe